Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church in Dallas and the Denver Metropolis — both represented by the Dallas law firm of Douglas D. Fletcher — made a motion on June 6th to expose the Plaintiff’s name to the public (see attached motion below). ((“Defendants’ Special Exception to Plaintiff’ Original Petition and Brief In Support”, pp. 1-3, Katinas-Fletcher-Special-Exception.pdf))
Attorneys representing both the Plaintiffs and the Defendants in the Nicholas Katinas sexual misconduct lawsuit went before a judge on August 7th to review this motion. The judge denied the Defendants’ motion and ruled that the Plaintiffs be allowed to continue to use pseudonyms within the public documents.
The judge also set the trial date for this case for June 9th, 2008.
Below are excerpts from the Plaintiffs’ response. Highlights are made for emphasis by the editors of OrthodoxReform. Source documents are available for download at the end of the document.
The Plaintiffs’ names in such cases are typically made known to the judge and the defendants in private, but to prevent further revictimization of the Plaintiffs, pseudonyms are used in public court documentation. This is a common practice in sexual abuse cases, as the Plaintiffs’ response points out:
There have been many, many cases litigated in Dallas county using John Doe and Jane Doe pseudonyms for both Plaintiffs and Defendants. …So long as the litigants know the identities of the Does, these types of cases clearly can be developed without denying fair play to anyone, certainly not the public. Even our own local media do not reveal the identities of sexual abuse victims. ((“Plaintiff’s Response to Defendants’ Special Exceptions”, p. 5, Katinas-Plaintiffs-Response.pdf))
Katinas’ name, however, is published in the court records. Is this a double standard? The Plaintiffs’ explain the difference: Read the rest of this entry »